vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bank First Corp (BFC) and Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bank First Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.9M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.4× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). Bank First Corp runs the higher net margin — 45.8% vs 0.6%, a 45.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bank First Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.1% vs -10.0%). Bank First Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.0M vs $1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Bank First Corp's revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs -0.7%).
First Horizon Corporation, formerly First Tennessee Bank, is a financial services company, founded in 1864, and based in Memphis, Tennessee. Through its banking subsidiary First Horizon Bank, it provides financial services through locations in 12 states across the Southeast, a region in which it is the fourth largest regional bank.
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
BFC vs GTIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $32.7M |
| Net Profit | $18.4M | $181.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 51.0% | 0.9% |
| Net Margin | 45.8% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.1% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.8% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.87 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.6M | $34.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.7M | $35.4M |
| Q4 25 | $18.4M | $181.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9M | $-624.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $164.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $230.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.4M | $618.0K |
| Q4 25 | 51.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.7% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.5% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.87 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.83 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.71 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.82 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.75 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.65 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.59 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.51 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $643.8M | $33.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $82.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $300.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.4M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $643.8M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.1M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $612.3M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $648.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $639.7M | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.9M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.6M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $609.3M | $31.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $85.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $86.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $89.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $89.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $62.5M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.0M | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 113.6% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.5% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.40× | 7.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.8M | $-72.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $62.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $714.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.8M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $394.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $735.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $-105.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $-466.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.0K | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 113.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 146.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.40× | 7.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.75× | -3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 2.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.09× | 2.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.