vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bank First Corp (BFC) and INSEEGO CORP. (INSG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INSEEGO CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.4M vs $44.9M, roughly 1.1× Bank First Corp). Bank First Corp runs the higher net margin — 45.8% vs 1.0%, a 44.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bank First Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.1% vs 0.6%). Bank First Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.0M vs $11.6M). Over the past eight quarters, INSEEGO CORP.'s revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs 9.1%).
First Horizon Corporation, formerly First Tennessee Bank, is a financial services company, founded in 1864, and based in Memphis, Tennessee. Through its banking subsidiary First Horizon Bank, it provides financial services through locations in 12 states across the Southeast, a region in which it is the fourth largest regional bank.
Inseego Corp designs, manufactures and delivers advanced 5G and IoT solutions including mobile hotspots, edge computing devices, and cloud-based device management platforms. It primarily serves telecom operators, enterprise clients, and public sector customers across global markets.
BFC vs INSG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $48.4M |
| Net Profit | $18.4M | $469.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.2% |
| Operating Margin | 51.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Margin | 45.8% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.1% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.8% | 182.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.87 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.6M | $40.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.1M | $31.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $48.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.7M | $37.5M |
| Q4 25 | $18.4M | $469.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9M | $507.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $-566.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $624.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.4M | $-4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.3% |
| Q4 25 | 51.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.6% | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.3% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.6% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | -11.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.87 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.83 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.71 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.82 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.75 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.65 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.59 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.51 | $-0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.2M | $24.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $643.8M | $-4.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $93.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.2M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.2M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $300.9M | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.3M | $39.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.4M | $12.3M |
| Q4 25 | $643.8M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.1M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $612.3M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $648.4M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $639.7M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.9M | $-85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.6M | $-101.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $609.3M | $-105.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $93.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $85.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $93.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $113.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $149.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $122.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $62.5M | $12.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.0M | $11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 113.6% | 24.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.5% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.40× | 25.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.8M | $6.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $62.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.8M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.6M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 113.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 146.3% | -29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.3% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.40× | 25.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | 2.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | -8.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 44.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.