vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BullFrog AI Holdings, Inc. (BFRG) and SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BullFrog AI Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.4K vs $79.0K, roughly 1.1× SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.). BullFrog AI Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1860.2% vs -12108.9%, a 10248.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Bullfrog Productions Limited was a British video game developer based in Guildford, England. Founded in 1987 by Peter Molyneux and Les Edgar, the company gained recognition in 1989 for their third release, Populous, and is also well known for titles such as Theme Park, Theme Hospital, Magic Carpet, Syndicate and Dungeon Keeper. Bullfrog's name was derived from an ornament in the offices of Edgar's and Molyneux's other enterprise, Taurus Impact Systems, Bullfrog's precursor where Molyneux and ...
SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative cancer immunotherapies for patients with unmet medical needs. Its core pipeline targets both hematological malignancies and solid tumors, with lead product candidates addressing indications like acute myeloid leukemia, primarily serving markets across North America.
BFRG vs SLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.4K | $79.0K |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $-9.6M |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1881.8% | -12208.9% |
| Net Margin | -1860.2% | -12108.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.0% | 13.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $83.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $79.0K |
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.6M |
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -1881.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4419.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12208.9% |
| Q3 25 | -1860.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4356.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12108.9% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.0M | $18.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9M | $9.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.7M | $24.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.4M |
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.7M |
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $-10.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.8M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
