vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BGC Group, Inc. (BGC) and PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $955.5M, roughly 1.1× BGC Group, Inc.). BGC Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 1.2%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BGC Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.8% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, BGC Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (48.2% CAGR vs 1.9%).

BGC Group, Inc. is an American global financial services company based in New York City and London. Originally formed as part of the larger Cantor Fitzgerald organization, BGC Partners became its own entity in 2004.

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

BGC vs BTU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BTU
BTU
1.1× larger
BTU
$1.0B
$955.5M
BGC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BGC
BGC
+52.8% gap
BGC
43.8%
-9.0%
BTU
Higher net margin
BGC
BGC
7.2% more per $
BGC
8.4%
1.2%
BTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BGC
BGC
Annualised
BGC
48.2%
1.9%
BTU

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Revenue
$955.5M
$1.0B
Net Profit
$80.6M
$12.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
0.8%
Net Margin
8.4%
1.2%
Revenue YoY
43.8%
-9.0%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.17
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
$955.5M
Q4 25
$638.6M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$620.8M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$648.0M
$890.1M
Q1 25
$534.6M
$937.0M
Q4 24
$475.2M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$448.9M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$435.0M
$1.0B
Net Profit
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
$80.6M
Q4 25
$14.4M
$12.4M
Q3 25
$27.9M
$-70.1M
Q2 25
$57.5M
$-27.6M
Q1 25
$55.2M
$34.4M
Q4 24
$25.2M
$37.8M
Q3 24
$14.7M
$101.3M
Q2 24
$37.8M
$199.4M
Operating Margin
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.9%
0.8%
Q3 25
5.4%
-8.0%
Q2 25
11.6%
-4.3%
Q1 25
15.0%
3.4%
Q4 24
5.7%
3.6%
Q3 24
4.4%
11.0%
Q2 24
12.7%
22.4%
Net Margin
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
8.4%
Q4 25
2.3%
1.2%
Q3 25
4.5%
-6.9%
Q2 25
8.9%
-3.1%
Q1 25
10.3%
3.7%
Q4 24
5.3%
3.4%
Q3 24
3.3%
9.3%
Q2 24
8.7%
19.1%
EPS (diluted)
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
$0.17
Q4 25
$0.03
$0.11
Q3 25
$0.06
$-0.58
Q2 25
$0.11
$-0.23
Q1 25
$0.11
$0.27
Q4 24
$0.04
$0.25
Q3 24
$0.03
$0.74
Q2 24
$0.08
$1.42

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$781.0M
$575.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.1B
$3.5B
Total Assets
$5.9B
$5.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
$781.0M
Q4 25
$851.5M
$575.3M
Q3 25
$774.9M
$603.3M
Q2 25
$827.8M
$585.9M
Q1 25
$966.4M
$696.5M
Q4 24
$711.6M
$700.4M
Q3 24
$563.5M
$772.9M
Q2 24
$571.7M
$621.7M
Total Debt
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.5B
$321.2M
Q3 25
$1.8B
$321.8M
Q2 25
$1.8B
$329.2M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$331.2M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$332.3M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$323.7M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$323.2M
Stockholders' Equity
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$972.5M
$3.5B
Q3 25
$965.3M
$3.5B
Q2 25
$930.5M
$3.6B
Q1 25
$963.8M
$3.7B
Q4 24
$898.5M
$3.7B
Q3 24
$860.1M
$3.6B
Q2 24
$858.1M
$3.7B
Total Assets
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
$5.9B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$5.8B
Q3 25
$5.8B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$4.9B
$5.8B
Q1 25
$4.9B
$5.8B
Q4 24
$3.6B
$6.0B
Q3 24
$4.4B
$5.9B
Q2 24
$4.3B
$5.9B
Debt / Equity
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.58×
0.09×
Q3 25
1.90×
0.09×
Q2 25
1.97×
0.09×
Q1 25
1.19×
0.09×
Q4 24
1.27×
0.09×
Q3 24
1.68×
0.09×
Q2 24
1.68×
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$180.4M
$68.6M
Q3 25
$141.9M
$122.0M
Q2 25
$71.2M
$23.2M
Q1 25
$839.0K
$119.9M
Q4 24
$251.9M
$119.8M
Q3 24
$88.3M
$359.9M
Q2 24
$-53.0M
$7.8M
Free Cash Flow
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$175.1M
Q3 25
$137.2M
Q2 25
$65.0M
Q1 25
$-4.4M
Q4 24
$245.6M
Q3 24
$78.8M
Q2 24
$-63.5M
FCF Margin
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
27.4%
Q3 25
22.1%
Q2 25
10.0%
Q1 25
-0.8%
Q4 24
51.7%
Q3 24
17.5%
Q2 24
-14.6%
Capex Intensity
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.8%
Q3 25
0.8%
Q2 25
1.0%
Q1 25
1.0%
Q4 24
1.3%
Q3 24
2.1%
Q2 24
2.4%
Cash Conversion
BGC
BGC
BTU
BTU
Q1 26
Q4 25
12.55×
5.53×
Q3 25
5.09×
Q2 25
1.24×
Q1 25
0.02×
3.49×
Q4 24
9.99×
3.17×
Q3 24
5.99×
3.55×
Q2 24
-1.40×
0.04×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BGC
BGC

Commissions$752.9M79%
Principal transactions$142.9M15%
Data, network and post-trade$34.5M4%
Other revenues$10.3M1%
Fees from related parties$4.3M0%

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

Related Comparisons