vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGC Group, Inc. (BGC) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BGC Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($955.5M vs $721.6M, roughly 1.3× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). BGC Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 3.4%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 43.8%). Over the past eight quarters, BGC Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (48.2% CAGR vs 42.4%).
BGC Group, Inc. is an American global financial services company based in New York City and London. Originally formed as part of the larger Cantor Fitzgerald organization, BGC Partners became its own entity in 2004.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
BGC vs CELH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $955.5M | $721.6M |
| Net Profit | $80.6M | $24.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.8% | 117.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 231.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.17 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $955.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $638.6M | $721.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $620.8M | $725.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $648.0M | $739.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $534.6M | $329.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.2M | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $448.9M | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $435.0M | $402.0M |
| Q1 26 | $80.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.9M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $99.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.2M | $44.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.8M | $79.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $781.0M | $398.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $676.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.9B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $781.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $851.5M | $398.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $774.9M | $806.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $827.8M | $615.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $966.4M | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $711.6M | $890.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.5M | $903.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $571.7M | $903.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $676.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $870.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $871.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $972.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $965.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $930.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $963.8M | $443.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $898.5M | $399.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $860.1M | $423.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $858.1M | $415.8M |
| Q1 26 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.58× | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.90× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.97× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-119.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-130.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -18.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -4.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $323.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.4M | $-119.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.9M | $331.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.2M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $839.0K | $103.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.9M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.0M | $39.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $175.1M | $-130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.2M | $321.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $96.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $245.6M | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.8M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-63.5M | $30.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.4% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.6% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.55× | -4.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.24× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.02× | 2.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.99× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.99× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.40× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGC
| Commissions | $752.9M | 79% |
| Principal transactions | $142.9M | 15% |
| Data, network and post-trade | $34.5M | 4% |
| Other revenues | $10.3M | 1% |
| Fees from related parties | $4.3M | 0% |
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
