vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Good Times Restaurants Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.7M vs $22.0M, roughly 1.5× BGSF, INC.). Good Times Restaurants Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -5.3%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BGSF, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.4% vs -10.0%). BGSF, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.7M vs $1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Good Times Restaurants Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.7% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
BGSF vs GTIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $32.7M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $181.0K |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 0.9% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $34.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $35.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $181.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-624.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $164.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $230.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $618.0K |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $33.2M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $82.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $31.6M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $85.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $86.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $89.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $89.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $-72.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $714.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $394.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $735.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-105.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $-466.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
GTIM
Segment breakdown not available.