vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BGSF, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.0M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.5× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -5.3%, a 69.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -9.4%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
BGSF vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.
