vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ladder Capital Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.3M vs $22.0M, roughly 1.0× BGSF, INC.). Ladder Capital Corp runs the higher net margin — 71.0% vs -5.3%, a 76.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BGSF, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.4% vs -18.0%). Ladder Capital Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($78.7M vs $1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, BGSF, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.3% CAGR vs -22.5%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
Ladder Capital Corp is a leading commercial real estate finance firm operating primarily across the United States. It originates and manages a diversified portfolio of senior secured commercial mortgage loans, mezzanine debt, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and direct real estate assets, serving property owners, operators and developers across major market segments.
BGSF vs LADR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $22.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $15.9M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 69.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 71.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | -18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | -49.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $22.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $34.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $37.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $31.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $16.4M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 96.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 74.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 90.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 49.4% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 71.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | 69.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 79.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 56.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 115.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 44.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $38.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $134.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $87.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $78.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 352.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 37.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $118.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $133.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $169.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $45.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $-20.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $78.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $127.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $44.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $-21.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 352.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | 93.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 201.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | -145.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 468.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 432.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | 131.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | -58.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 37.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
LADR
Segment breakdown not available.
