vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.4M vs $22.0M, roughly 2.0× BGSF, INC.). Montauk Renewables, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.7% vs -5.3%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Montauk Renewables, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (56.7% vs -9.4%). BGSF, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.7M vs $-41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Montauk Renewables, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
BGSF vs MNTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $43.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 56.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | 129.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $43.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $45.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $43.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $-464.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $-712.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 22.8% |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | -35.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $23.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $126.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $263.1M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $435.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $40.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $63.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.7M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $260.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $254.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $258.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $257.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $255.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $254.3M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $435.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $383.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $382.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $354.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $349.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $362.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $354.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $337.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $-41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | -94.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 95.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $-86.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $337.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $724.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $193.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $14.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $-7.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -94.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | -29.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | -19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 95.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 65.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 74.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
