vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology (BHAT) and NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V. (NAMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.1M vs $13.1M, roughly 1.5× Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology). Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology runs the higher net margin — -9.9% vs -90.7%, a 80.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology develops and produces interactive entertainment products including AR games, smart interactive toys, and immersive leisure content. It primarily serves mainland China's consumer market, with expanding distribution across Southeast Asia, focusing on family and youth entertainment segments.

Kite Pharma, Inc. is an American biotechnology company that develops cancer immunotherapy products with a primary focus on genetically engineered autologous CAR T cell therapy - a cell-based therapy which relies on chimeric antigen receptors and T cells. Founded in 2009, and based in Santa Monica, California, it was acquired by Gilead Sciences in 2017.

BHAT vs NAMS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NAMS
NAMS
1.5× larger
NAMS
$19.1M
$13.1M
BHAT
Higher net margin
BHAT
BHAT
80.8% more per $
BHAT
-9.9%
-90.7%
NAMS

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Revenue
$13.1M
$19.1M
Net Profit
$-1.3M
$-17.4M
Gross Margin
8.3%
Operating Margin
-9.4%
-186.1%
Net Margin
-9.9%
-90.7%
Revenue YoY
740.1%
Net Profit YoY
55.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.15

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$13.1M
$19.1M
Q4 24
$12.8M
Q3 24
$29.1M
Q2 24
$46.3M
Q2 23
$8.6M
Net Profit
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$-1.3M
$-17.4M
Q4 24
$-92.2M
Q3 24
$-16.6M
Q2 24
$-4.4M
Q2 23
$-42.0M
Gross Margin
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
8.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
0.2%
Q2 23
Operating Margin
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
-9.4%
-186.1%
Q4 24
-338.5%
Q3 24
-85.9%
Q2 24
-8.8%
Q2 23
-461.8%
Net Margin
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
-9.9%
-90.7%
Q4 24
-721.7%
Q3 24
-57.2%
Q2 24
-9.4%
Q2 23
-486.9%
EPS (diluted)
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$-0.15
Q4 24
$-0.91
Q3 24
$-0.18
Q2 24
Q2 23
$-0.51

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$14.3K
$739.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$32.1M
$778.5M
Total Assets
$75.2M
$815.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$14.3K
$739.2M
Q4 24
$834.2M
Q3 24
$422.7M
Q2 24
$407.6K
Q2 23
Stockholders' Equity
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$32.1M
$778.5M
Q4 24
$757.5M
Q3 24
$378.9M
Q2 24
$40.6M
Q2 23
$398.4M
Total Assets
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$75.2M
$815.1M
Q4 24
$864.6M
Q3 24
$439.2M
Q2 24
$49.3M
Q2 23

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.6M
$-37.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-37.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-197.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-119.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$2.6M
$-37.7M
Q4 24
$-37.5M
Q3 24
$-12.5M
Q2 24
Q2 23
$-31.9M
Free Cash Flow
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
$-37.8M
Q4 24
$-37.5M
Q3 24
$-12.6M
Q2 24
Q2 23
$-31.9M
FCF Margin
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
-197.2%
Q4 24
-293.5%
Q3 24
-43.2%
Q2 24
Q2 23
-369.3%
Capex Intensity
BHAT
BHAT
NAMS
NAMS
Q2 25
0.5%
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.3%
Q2 24
Q2 23
0.1%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons