vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bausch Health Companies Inc. (BHC) and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Huntington Ingalls Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.2× Bausch Health Companies Inc.). Huntington Ingalls Industries runs the higher net margin — 4.6% vs -3.7%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Huntington Ingalls Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 9.3%). Huntington Ingalls Industries produced more free cash flow last quarter ($516.0M vs $403.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Bausch Health Companies Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.0% CAGR vs 11.3%).
Bausch Health Companies Inc. is a global, diversified American-Canadian pharmaceutical company. Its global corporate headquarters are located in Laval, Quebec, Canada, and its U.S. headquarters are in Bridgewater, New Jersey. It develops, manufactures and markets a range of pharmaceutical products in gastroenterology, hepatology, neurology, dermatology, dentistry, medical aesthetics, and international pharmaceuticals. Bausch Health manufactures and markets branded pharmaceuticals, generic ph...
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) is the largest military shipbuilding company in the United States as well as a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry. HII was formed on 31 March 2011, as a divestiture from Northrop Grumman.
BHC vs HII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $3.5B |
| Net Profit | $-103.0M | $159.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.7% | 4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -205.1% | 29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $4.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $-103.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.0M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-58.0M | $149.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-85.0M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $173.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-64.0M | $153.0M |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.0% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.30 | $4.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.40 | $3.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $3.79 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.24 | $3.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $2.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $4.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | $3.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $20.8B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-554.0M | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $26.4B | $12.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $719.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $595.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $733.0M | $10.0M |
| Q4 25 | $20.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-554.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-565.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-764.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $26.4B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.8B | $12.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.4B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5B | $11.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9B | $11.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $495.0M | $650.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $403.0M | $516.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.4% | 14.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | $794.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $495.0M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.0M | $823.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.0M | $-395.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $391.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $405.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $211.0M | $-202.0M |
| Q4 25 | $403.0M | $516.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.0M | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.0M | $-462.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $495.0M | $277.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $334.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.0M | $-99.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.0M | $-277.0M |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | -9.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.26× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | 5.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.13× | 3.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.00× | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHC
| Bausch Lomb | $1.4B | 50% |
| Salix Segment | $693.0M | 25% |
| International Rx | $306.0M | 11% |
| Diversified Segment | $255.0M | 9% |
| Solta Medical Segment | $137.0M | 5% |
HII
| Aircraftcarriers | $984.0M | 28% |
| Fixedpriceincentive | $758.0M | 22% |
| Submarines | $744.0M | 21% |
| Surfacecombatantsandcoastguardcutters | $452.0M | 13% |
| Amphibiousassaultships | $433.0M | 12% |
| Costtype | $123.0M | 4% |
| Otherprograms | $4.0M | 0% |
