vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fossil Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.2M vs $165.6M, roughly 1.6× Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc.). Fossil Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -14.8% vs -20.3%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -21.1%). Fossil Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-22.5M vs $-37.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Fossil Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-11.4% CAGR vs -13.1%).
Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust focused on owning and operating premium luxury hotel and resort properties primarily across the United States. It caters to upscale leisure travelers, corporate event planners, and premium business guests, generating revenue via accommodation bookings, on-site amenities, and event hosting.
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
BHR vs FOSL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $165.6M | $270.2M |
| Net Profit | $-33.6M | $-40.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.3% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | -20.3% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | -21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.1% | -257.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.67 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $165.6M | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.6M | $220.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.1M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.3M | $342.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.4M | $287.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.6M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $219.1M | $254.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-33.6M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.7M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.6M | $-38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.9M | $-24.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.4% |
| Q4 25 | -7.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.4% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | -20.3% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | -9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.67 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.33 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.4M | $79.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $169.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $138.7M | $112.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $701.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 7.96× | 1.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.4M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.3M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.2M | $78.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | $123.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.7M | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.6M | $104.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.1M | $112.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $169.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $167.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $156.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $202.9M |
| Q4 25 | $138.7M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.9M | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $225.1M | $140.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $238.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.7M | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.9M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.3M | $189.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $307.3M | $229.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $701.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $704.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $763.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $812.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $785.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $891.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.96× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.50× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.38× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.03× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.36× | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.98× | 0.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $40.8M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-37.1M | $-22.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.4% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 47.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-59.2M | $-46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $-60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.8M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0K | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.0M | $622.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-37.1M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $-60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-159.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -22.4% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | -26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.5% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 47.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHR
| Occupancy | $97.4M | 59% |
| Food And Beverage | $45.5M | 28% |
| Hotel Other | $22.6M | 14% |
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
