vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

National Storage Affiliates Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($187.0M vs $165.6M, roughly 1.1× Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc.). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs -20.3%, a 32.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, National Storage Affiliates Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -4.5%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $-37.1M). Over the past eight quarters, National Storage Affiliates Trust's revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -13.1%).

Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust focused on owning and operating premium luxury hotel and resort properties primarily across the United States. It caters to upscale leisure travelers, corporate event planners, and premium business guests, generating revenue via accommodation bookings, on-site amenities, and event hosting.

National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.

BHR vs NSA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NSA
NSA
1.1× larger
NSA
$187.0M
$165.6M
BHR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
NSA
NSA
+2.9% gap
NSA
-1.6%
-4.5%
BHR
Higher net margin
NSA
NSA
32.5% more per $
NSA
12.2%
-20.3%
BHR
More free cash flow
NSA
NSA
$336.9M more FCF
NSA
$299.8M
$-37.1M
BHR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
NSA
NSA
Annualised
NSA
-2.4%
-13.1%
BHR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Revenue
$165.6M
$187.0M
Net Profit
$-33.6M
$22.9M
Gross Margin
72.5%
Operating Margin
-7.3%
20.2%
Net Margin
-20.3%
12.2%
Revenue YoY
-4.5%
-1.6%
Net Profit YoY
-80.1%
36.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.67
$0.23

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$165.6M
$187.0M
Q3 25
$143.6M
$188.7M
Q2 25
$179.1M
$188.8M
Q1 25
$215.8M
$188.4M
Q4 24
$173.3M
$190.1M
Q3 24
$148.4M
$193.6M
Q2 24
$187.6M
$190.4M
Q1 24
$219.1M
$196.1M
Net Profit
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$-33.6M
$22.9M
Q3 25
$5.7M
$18.4M
Q2 25
$-5.5M
$19.5M
Q1 25
$11.0M
$13.0M
Q4 24
$-18.7M
$16.7M
Q3 24
$12.6M
$18.7M
Q2 24
$-11.6M
$17.1M
Q1 24
$15.9M
$59.0M
Gross Margin
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
72.5%
Q3 25
70.7%
Q2 25
70.5%
Q1 25
70.7%
Q4 24
72.5%
Q3 24
72.8%
Q2 24
72.6%
Q1 24
72.1%
Operating Margin
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
-7.3%
20.2%
Q3 25
20.8%
15.8%
Q2 25
10.0%
16.5%
Q1 25
17.0%
11.0%
Q4 24
2.2%
14.5%
Q3 24
47.4%
15.8%
Q2 24
6.5%
17.2%
Q1 24
19.4%
48.9%
Net Margin
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
-20.3%
12.2%
Q3 25
4.0%
9.8%
Q2 25
-3.1%
10.3%
Q1 25
5.1%
6.9%
Q4 24
-10.8%
8.8%
Q3 24
8.5%
9.7%
Q2 24
-6.2%
9.0%
Q1 24
7.3%
30.1%
EPS (diluted)
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$-0.67
$0.23
Q3 25
$-0.12
$0.17
Q2 25
$-0.24
$0.19
Q1 25
$-0.04
$0.10
Q4 24
$-0.47
$0.19
Q3 24
$-0.02
$0.18
Q2 24
$-0.33
$0.16
Q1 24
$0.05
$0.65

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$124.4M
$23.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$138.7M
$946.0M
Total Assets
$1.9B
$5.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
7.96×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$124.4M
$23.3M
Q3 25
$116.3M
$26.3M
Q2 25
$80.2M
$26.1M
Q1 25
$81.7M
$19.3M
Q4 24
$135.5M
$50.4M
Q3 24
$168.7M
$69.9M
Q2 24
$114.6M
$59.0M
Q1 24
$137.1M
$64.2M
Total Debt
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$138.7M
$946.0M
Q3 25
$211.9M
$973.1M
Q2 25
$225.1M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$238.9M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$240.7M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$276.9M
$986.9M
Q2 24
$282.3M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$307.3M
$1.3B
Total Assets
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$1.9B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$2.0B
$5.1B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$5.2B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$5.3B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$5.4B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$5.4B
Q2 24
$2.2B
$5.3B
Q1 24
$2.3B
$5.4B
Debt / Equity
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
7.96×
Q3 25
5.50×
Q2 25
5.38×
Q1 25
5.03×
Q4 24
5.03×
Q3 24
4.36×
Q2 24
4.00×
Q1 24
3.98×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$40.8M
$338.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-37.1M
$299.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-22.4%
160.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
47.1%
20.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
14.79×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-59.2M
$541.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$40.8M
$338.5M
Q3 25
$-5.8M
$100.2M
Q2 25
$23.0M
$79.9M
Q1 25
$15.1M
$85.6M
Q4 24
$66.8M
$363.1M
Q3 24
$9.0K
$105.7M
Q2 24
$24.1M
$83.2M
Q1 24
$36.0M
$94.0M
Free Cash Flow
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
$-37.1M
$299.8M
Q3 25
$-27.3M
$88.0M
Q2 25
$5.3M
$73.8M
Q1 25
$-159.0K
$79.9M
Q4 24
$-3.8M
$344.4M
Q3 24
$-15.6M
$101.8M
Q2 24
$8.2M
$79.5M
Q1 24
$12.7M
$88.6M
FCF Margin
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
-22.4%
160.3%
Q3 25
-19.0%
46.6%
Q2 25
3.0%
39.1%
Q1 25
-0.1%
42.4%
Q4 24
-2.2%
181.2%
Q3 24
-10.5%
52.6%
Q2 24
4.4%
41.7%
Q1 24
5.8%
45.2%
Capex Intensity
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
47.1%
20.7%
Q3 25
15.0%
6.5%
Q2 25
9.9%
3.2%
Q1 25
7.1%
3.0%
Q4 24
40.7%
9.8%
Q3 24
10.5%
2.0%
Q2 24
8.5%
1.9%
Q1 24
10.7%
2.7%
Cash Conversion
BHR
BHR
NSA
NSA
Q4 25
14.79×
Q3 25
-1.00×
5.44×
Q2 25
4.10×
Q1 25
1.38×
6.59×
Q4 24
21.70×
Q3 24
0.00×
5.65×
Q2 24
4.88×
Q1 24
2.26×
1.59×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BHR
BHR

Occupancy$97.4M59%
Food And Beverage$45.5M28%
Hotel Other$22.6M14%

NSA
NSA

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons