vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.7× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -68.1%, a 103.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.7% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $-68.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 31.9%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
BHRB vs FIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $143.5M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-97.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | -45.7% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -68.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 77.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | 21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $140.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $122.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $96.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $84.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $82.5M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-97.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $-104.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $-70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $120.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $-124.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $-48.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $-50.3M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | -45.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -70.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | 81.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -152.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | -51.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -58.8% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | 125.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -154.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -51.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | -56.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -60.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $-1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $-1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $0.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $-0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $57.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $21.3M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 176.99× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $181.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $476.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $202.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $370.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $394.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $402.5M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 176.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $-2.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $-68.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | -47.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 45.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $-398.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $-85.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $-68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $-151.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-16.7M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | -47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | -64.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | -71.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | -157.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | -42.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 67.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 68.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | -0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
FIP
| Power Revenues | $45.9M | 32% |
| Rail Revenue | $44.6M | 31% |
| Service Other | $22.8M | 16% |
| Gas Revenues | $15.3M | 11% |
| Roadside Services Revenues | $11.5M | 8% |
| Rapauno | $1.2M | 1% |
