vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($134.3M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.6× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -3.2%, a 38.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.7% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $10.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered leading manufacturer of metal components, fabricated assemblies, and custom engineered solutions. It serves OEM clients across agriculture, construction, transportation, defense, and power sports markets, offering end-to-end services from prototyping to high-volume production for North America.
BHRB vs MEC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $134.3M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-4.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 6.8% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -3.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 10.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | -127.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $134.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $132.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $135.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $121.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $135.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $163.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $161.3M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $20.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | 4.7% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $240.7M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $563.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $206.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $183.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $206.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $178.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $314.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $314.0K |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $240.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $244.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $246.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $250.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $251.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $238.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $238.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $234.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $563.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $585.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $433.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $447.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $466.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $488.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $499.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $13.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $10.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $26.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $23.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $35.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | 416.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | 2.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 6.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | 3.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
MEC
| Fabrication | $72.2M | 54% |
| Construction And Access | $19.2M | 14% |
| Tubes | $16.2M | 12% |
| Other Market | $11.9M | 9% |
| Agriculture | $7.7M | 6% |
| Military | $6.7M | 5% |
| Outdoor Sports | $1.7M | 1% |
