vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and RICHARDSON ELECTRONICS, LTD. (RELL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.5M vs $52.3M, roughly 1.7× RICHARDSON ELECTRONICS, LTD.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -0.2%, a 35.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RICHARDSON ELECTRONICS, LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $-1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs -0.3%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
The James Richardson Corporation, also going by the name James Richardson Group or JR/Group, is an Australian furniture, hospitality, real estate and retail corporation, headquartered in the Abbotsford suburb of Melbourne, Australia. It is privately owned and employs approximately 2,300 people worldwide. It is perhaps best known among consumers for its duty-free retail stores in airports and border crossings in Australasia and the Middle East. The company is a household name in Israel due to ...
BHRB vs RELL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $52.3M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-121.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 0.3% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 5.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | 83.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $52.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $53.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $53.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $52.4M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-121.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $-751.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $590.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $750.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $33.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $158.5M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $201.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $158.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $159.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $152.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $156.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $159.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $158.6M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $201.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $200.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $189.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $195.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $193.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $-99.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | -3.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $-99.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $412.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $342.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $-514.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | -5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | -3.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
RELL
| Power And Microwave Technologies Group | $35.2M | 67% |
| Canvys | $8.8M | 17% |
| Global Energy Solutions | $8.3M | 16% |
