vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and TELOS CORP (TLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.5M vs $46.8M, roughly 1.9× TELOS CORP). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -34.9%, a 69.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TELOS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $8.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 25.7%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
Telos Corporation is an information technology and cybersecurity company located in Ashburn, Virginia. Telos primarily serves government and enterprise clients, receiving a large number of its contracts from the United States Department of Defense. Customers are primarily military, intelligence and civilian agencies of the US government and NATO allies.
BHRB vs TLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $46.8M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-16.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | -39.6% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -34.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 77.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | -74.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | -39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | -121.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | -30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -118.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | -27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -24.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $53.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $96.0M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $139.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $93.9M |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $119.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $127.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $129.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $154.4M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $158.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $195.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $8.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | 17.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $29.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $-350.0K |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-447.0K |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | -47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
TLS
| Security Solutions Segment | $44.8M | 96% |
| Secure Networks Segment | $1.9M | 4% |
