vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC. (BHST) and GLOBUS MARITIME LTD (GLBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLOBUS MARITIME LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5M vs $8.4M, roughly 1.1× BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC.).
BioHarvest Sciences Inc. is a biotechnology firm that develops and produces sustainable, high-purity plant-derived bioactive ingredients. It serves the nutraceutical, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical sectors, leveraging proprietary cell cultivation technology to create efficacious natural products without large-scale agricultural farming.
Globus Maritime Ltd is a global shipping enterprise specializing in ownership, operation and chartering of dry bulk cargo vessels. It transports iron ore, coal, grain and other industrial raw materials across major global trade routes, serving clients in logistics, commodities trading and manufacturing sectors worldwide.
BHST vs GLBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.4M | $9.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | — | -19.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -157.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $19.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $11.0M |
| Q3 25 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -17.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 57.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 57.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $48.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $173.1M |
| Total Assets | — | $309.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $43.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $173.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $178.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $172.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $169.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $309.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $217.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $206.2M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHST
Segment breakdown not available.
GLBS
| Other | $4.8M | 51% |
| Property Plant And Equipment Subject To Operating Leases | $4.7M | 49% |
