vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC. (BHST) and GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC. (GP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.4M vs $7.2M, roughly 1.2× GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC.).
BioHarvest Sciences Inc. is a biotechnology firm that develops and produces sustainable, high-purity plant-derived bioactive ingredients. It serves the nutraceutical, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical sectors, leveraging proprietary cell cultivation technology to create efficacious natural products without large-scale agricultural farming.
GreenPower Motor Company Inc. is a Canadian electric bus manufacturer and distributor in North America. The company fabricates multiple zero-emission models, including transit buses, school buses, and double decker buses. GreenPower headquarters are in Vancouver, British Columbia, with a sales office in Rancho Cucamonga, California; an assembly facility in Porterville, California; and a production facility in South Charleston, West Virginia. Its stock is traded on Nasdaq the United States.
BHST vs GP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.4M | $7.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 14.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | -65.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -2.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $8.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-4.3M |
| Q3 25 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 14.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -65.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -87.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -179.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -56.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -50.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $621.1K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.1M |
| Total Assets | — | $37.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $621.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $528.3K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $2.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $22.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-5.4M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.