vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (BIAF) and Onfolio Holdings, Inc (ONFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Onfolio Holdings, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0M vs $1.6M, roughly 1.3× bioAffinity Technologies, Inc.). Onfolio Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — -27.0% vs -197.0%, a 170.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Onfolio Holdings, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-20.1% vs -27.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Onfolio Holdings, Inc's revenue compounded faster (13.0% CAGR vs -18.6%).
bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology firm focused on developing non-invasive in vitro diagnostic tests for early detection of cancer and respiratory diseases. It serves global healthcare markets, with a core mission to deliver accessible, high-accuracy diagnostic solutions that improve patient outcomes and reduce overall healthcare system costs.
Onfolio Holdings Inc. acquires, manages and grows a diversified portfolio of small to medium-sized online businesses, including niche content sites, e-commerce stores, and SaaS tools. It operates primarily in North America and Western Europe, focusing on high-margin, sustainable digital assets with stable revenue streams.
BIAF vs ONFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $2.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.1M | $-547.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | -196.9% | -59.1% |
| Net Margin | -197.0% | -27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -27.8% | -20.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.7% | -69.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.59 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.1M | $-547.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-700.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $-534.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-806.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $-323.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-335.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $-629.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.0M | $-477.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | -196.9% | -59.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -158.6% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -198.2% | -16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -141.7% | -27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -133.5% | -43.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -84.0% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -87.1% | -35.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | -28.7% |
| Q4 25 | -197.0% | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -349.3% | -25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -319.9% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -143.5% | -28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -134.4% | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -85.1% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.0% | -36.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -81.5% | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.59 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.74 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.17 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.27 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.84 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.19 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3M | $2.5M |
| Total Assets | $11.0M | $11.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $802.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $444.7K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $801.3K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $529.8K |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $11.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0M | $8.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.6M | $-397.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -160.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-9.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.6M | $-397.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $34.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-430.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-145.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $-471.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $67.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $-332.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | $-431.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -160.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -171.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -209.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -91.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -76.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -99.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIAF
Segment breakdown not available.
ONFO
| B Two B | $1.6M | 81% |
| B Two C | $243.0K | 12% |
| Other | $138.6K | 7% |
