vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Biogen (BIIB) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Biogen is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.9× Rivian Automotive, Inc.). Biogen runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs -63.1%, a 76.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Biogen posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs -25.8%). Biogen produced more free cash flow last quarter ($594.3M vs $-1.1B). Over the past eight quarters, Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Biogen Inc. is an American multinational biotechnology company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States specializing in the treatment of neurological diseases. The company's primary products are dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), diroximel fumarate (Vumerity), interferon beta-1a (AVONEX), peginterferon beta-1a (Plegridy), and natalizumab (Tysabri), all for the treatment of multiple sclerosis ; nusinersen (Spinraza) for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy ; omaveloxolone (Skyclarys) for ...
Rivian Automotive, Inc., is an American electric vehicle manufacturer and automotive technology company founded in 2009. It produces an electric sport utility vehicle (SUV), a pickup truck on a "skateboard" platform that can support future vehicles or be adopted by other companies, and an electric delivery van, the Rivian EDV. It started deliveries of its R1T pickup truck in late 2021. The company planned to build an exclusive charging network in the United States and Canada by the end of 2023.
BIIB vs RIVN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $319.5M | $-811.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -64.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.9% | -63.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.0% | -25.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.8% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.15 | $-0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $874.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $319.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-48.9M | $-811.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.5M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $634.8M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.5M | $-545.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $266.7M | $-744.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.5M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $583.6M | $-1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.1% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.1% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.1% | -44.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.8% | -38.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | -64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | -63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.1% | -85.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -52.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -38.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | -133.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | -118.7% |
| Q1 26 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | -63.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | -75.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.0% | -85.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | -44.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | -42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.7% | -125.8% |
| Q1 26 | $2.15 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.17 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.33 | $-0.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.64 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.82 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.66 | $-1.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $-1.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.4B | $6.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.7B | $4.6B |
| Total Assets | $29.5B | $14.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9B | $6.8B |
| Q1 26 | $29.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.4B | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2B | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.3B | $15.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.3B | $14.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.40× | 0.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-681.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $594.3M | $-1.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | -89.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 36.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.4B | $-2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $511.9M | $-681.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.9M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.3M | $-188.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $760.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.6M | $-876.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $625.8M | $-754.0M |
| Q1 26 | $594.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $468.0M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $-421.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.3M | $-398.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.2M | $-526.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $721.6M | $856.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $900.6M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.3M | $-1.0B |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | -89.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.4% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | -30.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | -42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.5% | -131.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | -89.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 36.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 24.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIIB
| Product revenue, net | $1.8B | 71% |
| Royalty revenue on sales of OCREVUS | $317.2M | 13% |
| Contract manufacturing, royalty and other revenue | $246.9M | 10% |
| Biogen's share of pre-tax profits in the U.S. for RITUXAN, GAZYVA and LUNSUMIO | $94.7M | 4% |
| Alzheimer's collaboration Revenue | $59.5M | 2% |
| Other revenue from anti-CD20 therapeutic programs | $7.2M | 0% |
RIVN
| Automotive Segment | $839.0M | 65% |
| Software And Services Segment | $447.0M | 35% |
| Regulatory Credits | $30.0M | 2% |
