vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BILL Holdings, Inc. (BILL) and ONTO INNOVATION INC. (ONTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BILL Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($414.7M vs $218.2M, roughly 1.9× ONTO INNOVATION INC.). ONTO INNOVATION INC. runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs -0.6%, a 13.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BILL Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.4% vs -13.5%). BILL Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($103.8M vs $82.0M). Over the past eight quarters, BILL Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.3% CAGR vs 2.6%).
BILL Holdings, Inc. is an American company based in San Jose, California, that provides automated, cloud-based software for financial operations for small businesses in the United States. A white-labeled, end-to-end payments automation platform, Bill.com Connect is offered to financial institutions as part of their single sign-on online business banking ecosystem.
Onto Innovation Inc. is an American semiconductor company formed in 2019 from the merger of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Nanometrics Incorporated. It is a provider of process and process control equipment and software for microelectronic manufacturing industries.
BILL vs ONTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $414.7M | $218.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.6M | $28.2M |
| Gross Margin | 79.8% | 50.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | -0.6% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.4% | -13.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -107.7% | -46.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $414.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.7M | $218.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $383.3M | $253.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $358.2M | $266.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.6M | $263.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.4M | $252.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $343.7M | $242.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.0M | $228.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.1M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $64.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5M | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $52.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | $46.9M |
| Q4 25 | 79.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.5% | 50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 80.8% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.2% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.6% | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.0% | 54.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.0% | 52.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.0% | 51.7% |
| Q4 25 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.6% | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.8% | 20.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.57 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $1.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $603.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $603.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $203.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.5M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $985.9M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $952.5M | $190.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $914.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $914.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $105.3M | $83.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $103.8M | $82.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.0% | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $378.8M | $261.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.9M | $83.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.8M | $57.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.5M | $92.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.7M | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.6M | $67.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6M | $65.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.8M | $57.1M |
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.6M | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.0M | $44.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.6M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.8M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.7% | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.35× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.94× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.35× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.10× | 1.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BILL
| Accounts Payable And Accounts Receivable Solutions | $185.9M | 45% |
| Spend And Expense Interchange Revenue | $166.5M | 40% |
| Interest On Funds Held For Customers | $39.5M | 10% |
| Embedded And Other Solutions | $22.8M | 5% |
ONTO
| Systems And Software Revenue | $173.8M | 80% |
| Parts Revenue | $23.9M | 11% |
| Service Revenue | $20.5M | 9% |
