vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. (BIO) and RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS INC. (RYAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($693.2M vs $417.5M, roughly 1.7× RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS INC.). BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 103.9% vs -5.0%, a 108.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.9% vs -1.2%). Over the past eight quarters, BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 3.8%).
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. is an American developer and manufacturer of specialized technological products for the life science research and clinical diagnostics markets. The company was founded in 1952 in Berkeley, California, by husband and wife team David and Alice Schwartz, both graduates of the University of California, Berkeley. Bio-Rad is based in Hercules, California, and has operations worldwide.
Rayonier Advanced Materials recently rebranded as RYAM. RYAM is an American company recognized globally for its cellulose-based technologies. Specializing in high-purity cellulose specialties, RYAM produces natural polymers extensively used in manufacturing filters, food, pharmaceuticals, and various industrial applications. Additionally, the company produces products for the paper and packaging industries. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ...
BIO vs RYAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $693.2M | $417.5M |
| Net Profit | $720.0M | $-21.1M |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 8.9% |
| Operating Margin | -17.2% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | 103.9% | -5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.9% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.6% | -31.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $26.59 | $-0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $693.2M | $417.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.0M | $352.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $651.6M | $340.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $585.4M | $356.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $667.5M | $422.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.7M | $401.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.5M | $419.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $610.8M | $387.7M |
| Q4 25 | $720.0M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-341.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.8M | $-363.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.0M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-715.8M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $653.2M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2B | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $383.9M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 49.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.4% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -17.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.8% | -106.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | -9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -107.2% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 100.5% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -339.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.9% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $26.59 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.70 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.67 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.29 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.89 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.34 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-76.26 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.45 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $75.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $758.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.5B | $316.6M |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | 2.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $129.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $136.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $54.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $758.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $763.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $720.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $707.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $706.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $747.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $752.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $755.6M |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | $316.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7B | $338.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $688.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $713.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $732.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $755.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1B | $741.8M |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | 2.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.18× | 2.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $164.9M | $32.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $119.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.23× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $374.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $164.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.9M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.5M | $-30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.9M | $39.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.2M | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $163.6M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $97.6M | $87.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.18× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIO
| Clinical Diagnostics | $425.3M | 61% |
| Life Science | $267.9M | 39% |
RYAM
| Cellulose Specialties | $249.6M | 60% |
| Other | $86.2M | 21% |
| Paperboard | $44.2M | 11% |
| High Yield Pulp | $28.3M | 7% |
| Biomaterials | $9.2M | 2% |
