vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) and HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.1M vs $77.6M, roughly 1.2× Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.). Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. runs the higher net margin — -9.6% vs -98.1%, a 88.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs -8.4%).
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
BIOX vs HIVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.6M | $93.1M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $-91.3M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | -27.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | -98.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.8% | 218.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.2% | -234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.6M | $87.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.3M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $605.2K | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $80.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-18.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | -43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | -66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -98.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | -18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 233.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -56.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $288.3M | $559.3M |
| Total Assets | $734.9M | $624.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $559.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.3M | $624.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $560.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.3M | $430.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $275.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $268.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $348.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $624.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $734.9M | $693.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $628.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $798.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.2M | $478.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.3M | $334.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $46.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $-28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-55.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -189.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -153.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 143.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.85× | -0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.78× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
