vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) and Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($77.6M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.6× Mama's Creations, Inc.). Mama's Creations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -9.6%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mama's Creations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (50.0% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Mama's Creations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs -8.4%).
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
BIOX vs MAMA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.6M | $47.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $540.0K |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.8% | 50.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.2% | 31.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.6M | $35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $33.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $31.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.3M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.0M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $540.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $605.2K | $410.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $553.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.8M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.4% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.8% | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $288.3M | $49.6M |
| Total Assets | $734.9M | $84.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.4M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.3M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.0M | $24.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.3M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $348.5M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $734.9M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $798.2M | $47.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.2M | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.3M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.1M | $45.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $6.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $-857.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-930.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.85× | 11.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.78× | 4.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
