vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.3M vs $77.6M, roughly 1.9× Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -9.6%, a 15.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.6% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.8% CAGR vs -8.4%).
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
Shoals Technologies Group is a leading provider of electrical balance of systems solutions for renewable energy and e-mobility. It supplies connectivity components for solar projects, energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure, serving clients across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
BIOX vs SHLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.6M | $148.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 31.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.8% | 38.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.2% | 3.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $148.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.6M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $80.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.3M | $102.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.0M | $90.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-282.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $605.2K | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-267.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.8M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.4% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.8% | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $288.3M | $600.0M |
| Total Assets | $734.9M | $904.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.4M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.3M | $589.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.0M | $558.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.3M | $556.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $545.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $544.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $348.5M | $554.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $904.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $734.9M | $851.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $795.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $798.2M | $788.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.2M | $793.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.3M | $801.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.1M | $825.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-16.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.85× | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.78× | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIOX
Segment breakdown not available.
SHLS
| System Solutions | $122.0M | 82% |
| Components | $26.3M | 18% |
