vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP) and Ecolab (ECL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $4.1B, roughly 1.3× Ecolab). Ecolab runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 4.6%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ecolab posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.0% vs 5.7%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Ecolab Inc., headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota, provides products related to water treatment, sanitation, and hygiene, primarily to commercial and industrial customers.
BIP vs ECL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $4.1B |
| Net Profit | $252.0M | $432.6M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.0% | 1.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $1.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $4.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | $432.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $563.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $585.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.0M | $524.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $402.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $472.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $736.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.0M | $490.9M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 44.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 43.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 16.5% |
| Q2 26 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 12.3% |
| Q2 26 | — | $1.52 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $1.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $1.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3B | $519.8K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.6B | $10.0M |
| Total Assets | $108.7B | $25.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $519.8K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $646.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $384.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.6B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.1B | $8.3B |
| Q2 26 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $24.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.9B | $21.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $791.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $701.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $766.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $786.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $611.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $529.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $485.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $550.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $414.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.72× | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.74× | 1.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIP
Segment breakdown not available.
ECL
| Product and equipment sales | $3.2B | 78% |
| Service and lease sales | $891.5M | 22% |
