vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP) and LEAR CORP (LEA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.8B vs $5.4B, roughly 1.1× Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.). Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 4.6% vs 3.0%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs 4.7%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
BIP vs LEA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $5.8B |
| Net Profit | $252.0M | $172.3M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 7.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.0% | 113.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $3.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $172.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.0M | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.0M | $173.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $3.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $3.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3B | $881.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.6B | $5.3B |
| Total Assets | $108.7B | $15.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $881.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $887.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $779.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $763.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $950.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.6B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.1B | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7B | $15.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.9B | $14.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | $98.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-26.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.72× | 0.57× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $732.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $444.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $296.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-127.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $680.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $182.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $291.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-26.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $170.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $488.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $170.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.72× | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.74× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIP
Segment breakdown not available.
LEA
| Seating | $4.4B | 76% |
| E-Systems | $1.4B | 24% |
