vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.5× TELUS CORP). Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 4.6% vs -4.8%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs 2.2%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
BIP vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $252.0M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.0% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 23 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7B | — |
| Q2 25 | $252.0M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.0M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $773.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $425.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 90.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 87.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 26.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 23.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 11.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.6B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $108.7B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $676.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.3B | — |
| Q2 25 | $29.6B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.1B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 23 | $28.6B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $26.0B | — |
| Q2 25 | $108.7B | $44.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.9B | $41.8B | ||
| Q2 23 | $81.7B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $73.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $851.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 23 | $970.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $734.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | 4.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.74× | 6.28× | ||
| Q2 23 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 1.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
