vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) and Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($539.1M vs $526.3M, roughly 1.0× Birkenstock Holding plc). Birkenstock Holding plc runs the higher net margin — 19.3% vs 6.4%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Birkenstock Holding plc is a German shoe manufacturer known for its sandals and other shoes notable for contoured cork footbeds (soles), made with layers of suede and jute, which conform to the shape of their wearers' feet. Founded in 1774 by Johann Adam Birkenstock and headquartered in Neustadt (Wied), Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, the company's original purpose was to create shoes that support and contour the foot, compared to the flat soles of many shoes during that time. In 1896, the Fus...
Concentra Inc., is a national health care establishment centered around occupational health. It was founded in 1979 in Amarillo, Texas, and the headquarters of the corporation is in Addison, Texas. It runs 627 occupational health centers and 410 onsite health clinics at employer worksites across 47 states. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Concentra treats one out of every seven occupational injuries in the United States. It is currently a publicly traded company with over 80% of t...
BIRK vs CON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $526.3M | $539.1M |
| Net Profit | $101.4M | $34.7M |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 12.9% |
| Net Margin | 19.3% | 6.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $539.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $526.3M | $572.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $685.8M | $550.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $620.3M | $500.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $455.8M | $489.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $609.9M | $477.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $519.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.6M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.5M | $38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.6M | $51.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $355.4M | $79.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $393.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.4M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.8M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $254.2M | $52.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $322.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $384.3M | $136.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.7M | $50.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $393.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $385.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $342.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $307.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $415.0M | $118.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $98.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 18.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.09× | 3.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $197.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $415.0M | $60.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $463.0M | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $98.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.09× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIRK
Segment breakdown not available.
CON
| Occupational Health Center Workers Compensation | $328.5M | 61% |
| Occupational Health Center Employer Services | $151.9M | 28% |
| Onsite Health Clinics | $36.2M | 7% |
| Other Businesses | $12.3M | 2% |
| Occupational Health Center Consumer Health | $8.1M | 2% |
| Occupational Health Center Other | $2.1M | 0% |
