vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BNY Mellon (BK) and L3Harris (LHX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
L3Harris is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7B vs $5.4B, roughly 1.1× BNY Mellon). BNY Mellon runs the higher net margin — 30.1% vs 8.9%, a 21.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, L3Harris posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.0% vs 12.9%). Over the past eight quarters, BNY Mellon's revenue compounded faster (129.2% CAGR vs 5.0%).
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, commonly known as BNY or by its prior brand name BNY Mellon, is an American international financial services company headquartered in New York City. It was established in its current form in July 2007 by the merger of the Bank of New York and Mellon Financial Corporation.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company, defense contractor, and information technology services provider that produces products for command and control systems, wireless equipment, tactical radios, avionics and electronic systems, night vision equipment, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems and products, ocean systems, instrumentation, navigation products, training devices and services, and both terrestrial/spaceborne antennas for use in the govern...
BK vs LHX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $5.7B |
| Net Profit | $1.6B | $512.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 175.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 30.1% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 24.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.4% | 32.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.24 | $2.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | $21.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $462.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $453.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $400.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $366.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 108.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 116.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 118.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 105.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 96.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 112.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 113.4% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | $2.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.01 | $2.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.88 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.93 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.58 | $2.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.53 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.50 | $2.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.52 | $1.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $590.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $32.6B | $350.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $172.0B | $19.7M |
| Total Assets | $561.5B | $41.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $482.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $615.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2B | $539.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $547.0M |
| Q1 26 | $32.6B | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.9B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4B | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | $172.0B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.3B | $19.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.0B | $19.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.1B | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.0B | $19.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8B | $18.8B |
| Q1 26 | $561.5B | $41.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $472.3B | $41.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $455.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $485.8B | $41.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.7B | $42.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.5B | $41.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $428.5B | $41.7B |
| Q1 26 | 0.19× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.79× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-95.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-187.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $546.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $640.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-312.0M | $780.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $754.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $427.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $552.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-687.0M | $702.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $657.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 352.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -121.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 152.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 95.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -65.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 169.6% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.55× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.54× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | 2.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.26× | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 2.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BK
| Investment services fees | $2.7B | 49% |
| Other | $1.4B | 25% |
| Investment management and performance fees | $785.0M | 15% |
| Investment and other revenue | $271.0M | 5% |
| Foreign exchange revenue | $232.0M | 4% |
| Financing-related fees | $62.0M | 1% |
| Distribution and servicing fees | $37.0M | 1% |
LHX
| Space & Mission Systems | $3.0B | 52% |
| Communication & Spectrum Dominance | $1.9B | 32% |
| Missile Solutions | $990.0M | 17% |
