vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BNY Mellon (BK) and SharkNinja, Inc. (SN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SharkNinja, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.5B vs $5.4B, roughly 1.0× BNY Mellon). On growth, SharkNinja, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs 12.9%).
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, commonly known as BNY or by its prior brand name BNY Mellon, is an American international financial services company headquartered in New York City. It was established in its current form in July 2007 by the merger of the Bank of New York and Mellon Financial Corporation.
SharkNinja is a global product design and technology company based in Needham, Massachusetts. Founded in 1994 by Mark Rosenzweig and led by CEO Mark Barrocas, who joined the company in 2008 as president. The company's name is formed by combining its two primary brands: Shark and Ninja.
BK vs SN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $5.5B |
| Net Profit | $1.6B | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 30.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.24 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 108.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 116.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 118.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 105.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 96.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 112.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 113.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.88 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.93 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.53 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $363.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $32.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $172.0B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $561.5B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $32.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $172.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $561.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $472.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $455.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $485.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $428.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $446.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $308.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $446.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-312.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $308.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-687.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 352.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -121.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 152.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 95.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -65.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 169.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BK
| Investment services fees | $2.7B | 49% |
| Other | $1.4B | 25% |
| Investment management and performance fees | $785.0M | 15% |
| Investment and other revenue | $271.0M | 5% |
| Foreign exchange revenue | $232.0M | 4% |
| Financing-related fees | $62.0M | 1% |
| Distribution and servicing fees | $37.0M | 1% |
SN
Segment breakdown not available.
