vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BUCKLE INC (BKE) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BUCKLE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.8M vs $252.5M, roughly 1.3× USA Compression Partners, LP). BUCKLE INC runs the higher net margin — 15.2% vs 11.0%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BUCKLE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 2.7%). USA Compression Partners, LP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.7M vs $38.4M).
The Buckle, Inc., is an American fashion retailer selling clothing, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and children. The company operates 451 stores in 42 states throughout the United States of America, under the names Buckle and The Buckle. Buckle markets brand name and private label apparel, including denim, other casual bottoms, tops and shirts, dresses and rompers, sportswear and athleisure, outerwear, footwear, swimwear, fragrances, sunglasses, bags and purses, wallets, and other ...
USA Compression Partners, LP is a US-based provider of natural gas compression services and related infrastructure solutions. It serves clients across the upstream, midstream, and downstream segments of the oil and gas industry, offering custom compression systems, maintenance, and operational support to facilitate efficient natural gas production, processing, and transportation.
BKE vs USAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $320.8M | $252.5M |
| Net Profit | $48.7M | $27.8M |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 30.3% |
| Net Margin | 15.2% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | 9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $320.8M | $252.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.7M | $250.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.1M | $250.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.2M | $245.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $245.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $240.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $229.3M |
| Q4 25 | $48.7M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.0M | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.2% |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.54 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.0M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $510.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $2.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8M | $2.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $510.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $476.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $423.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $977.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $913.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.4M | $139.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $38.4M | $87.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.0% | 34.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 20.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.02× | 5.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $215.3M | $277.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.4M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.4M | $75.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $124.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.8M | $54.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $130.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $65.9M |
| Q4 25 | $38.4M | $87.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.4M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.0M | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-32.7M |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 40.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.02× | 5.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 2.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | 4.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | 2.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BKE
Segment breakdown not available.
USAC
| Revenue From Contract Operations Excluding Revenue From Related Party | $231.7M | 92% |
| Entities Affiliated With Energy Transfer LP | $16.6M | 7% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.4M | 2% |
