vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BLACK HILLS CORP (BKH) and Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BLACK HILLS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($622.7M vs $20.1M, roughly 30.9× Ellomay Capital Ltd.). Over the past eight quarters, Ellomay Capital Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (386.1% CAGR vs -6.8%).
Black Hills Corporation is an American diversified energy company that is an electric and gas utility in South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa. The company sells power throughout the American West. The company is based in Rapid City, South Dakota. It derives its name from its home in the Black Hills of South Dakota.
Ellomay Capital Ltd is a renewable energy enterprise focused on the development, ownership, and operation of clean power assets. Its portfolio includes solar photovoltaic projects, onshore wind farms, and pumped storage hydroelectric facilities, with core operations across Israel and key European markets, delivering low-carbon energy to both commercial and residential end consumers.
BKH vs ELLO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $622.7M | $20.1M |
| Net Profit | $104.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.5% | -11.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $622.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $427.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $435.7M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.4M | $945.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $397.1M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $717.2M | $71.0K |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | -11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.6% | -140.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.0% | -2991.5% |
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.87 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.87 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.8M | $54.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $171.5M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $855.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $624.8M | $59.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $171.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $136.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $855.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2B | $678.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.7B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $168.1M | $5.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-101.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-146.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $168.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $188.6M | $5.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.6M | $468.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-101.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BKH
| Gas Utilities | $391.1M | 63% |
| Retail Electric Natural Gasand Coal | $189.7M | 30% |
| Other | $15.3M | 2% |
| Market Off System Sales | $13.6M | 2% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.9M | 1% |
| Wholesale | $4.9M | 1% |
| Inter Segment Revenues | $2.4M | 0% |
ELLO
Segment breakdown not available.
