vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BLACK HILLS CORP (BKH) and Lionsgate Studios Corp. (LION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lionsgate Studios Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($724.3M vs $241.6M, roughly 3.0× BLACK HILLS CORP). BLACK HILLS CORP runs the higher net margin — 55.1% vs -6.4%, a 61.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lionsgate Studios Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (52.5% vs -3.0%).
Black Hills Corporation is an American diversified energy company that is an electric and gas utility in South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa. The company sells power throughout the American West. The company is based in Rapid City, South Dakota. It derives its name from its home in the Black Hills of South Dakota.
Lionsgate Canada is a Canadian entertainment company and a subsidiary of Lionsgate Studios. Based in the Entertainment District in the city of Toronto, the company is primarily involved in the acquisition and production of films and television series.
BKH vs LION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $241.6M | $724.3M |
| Net Profit | $133.1M | $-46.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 83.6% | 5.0% |
| Net Margin | 55.1% | -6.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.0% | 52.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.4% | 59.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $241.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.7M | $724.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $427.4M | $475.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $435.7M | $525.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $397.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $133.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $-46.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.9M | $-113.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5M | $-108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | -6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | -20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.73 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.87 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.33 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $182.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-1.3B |
| Total Assets | — | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $182.8M | $182.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.1M | $202.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $186.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $624.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $-1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-111.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.1M | $-108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.9M | $-104.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $188.6M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-101.5M | $-111.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.5M | $-107.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.3M | $-34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.3% | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | -22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.11× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BKH
Segment breakdown not available.
LION
| Television Production | $303.1M | 42% |
| Digital Media | $155.1M | 21% |
| Third Party Purchasers Individual Agreements | $91.2M | 13% |
| Theatrical | $70.7M | 10% |
| Domestic Television | $43.1M | 6% |
| Starz Business | $24.1M | 3% |
| Other Media | $17.6M | 2% |
| Packaged Media | $14.1M | 2% |
