vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Black Hawk Acquisition Corp (BKHA) and Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd (JF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.2K vs $230.6K, roughly 1.3× Black Hawk Acquisition Corp). Black Hawk Acquisition Corp runs the higher net margin — -1.6% vs -31.0%, a 29.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd is a fintech SaaS provider offering end-to-end digital financial solutions. Its core services include intelligent risk management, digital lending facilitation, and wealth management tools, serving banks, consumer finance firms and e-commerce platforms primarily in the Chinese market.
BKHA vs JF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $230.6K | $295.2K |
| Net Profit | $-3.8K | $-91.6K |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | -94.5% | -47.2% |
| Net Margin | -1.6% | -31.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -100.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $230.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.5K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $767.6K | $295.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.9K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $965.5K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $668.2K | $289.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $520.5K | $-91.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $658.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $310.9K | $-161.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.6% |
| Q4 25 | -94.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -69.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.3% | -47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -53.8% | -51.1% |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | -31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 86.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 91.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.5% | -55.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $653.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $23.9M | $1.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $653.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $863.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.5M | $2.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-100.5K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-100.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-107.9K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-278.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-163.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-42.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-414.2K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
