vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BlackSky Technology Inc. (BKSY) and TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BlackSky Technology Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $20.4M, roughly 1.7× TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs -2.5%, a 67.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, BlackSky Technology Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 9.1%).
BlackSky Technology Inc. is a leading geospatial intelligence provider operating a constellation of high-revisit small Earth observation satellites. It delivers real-time satellite imagery, advanced data analytics, and dynamic monitoring solutions to government, defense, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients globally to support data-driven operational decision-making.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
BKSY vs MITT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.2M | $20.4M |
| Net Profit | $-868.0K | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | 67.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.5% | 65.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.5% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $35.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.2M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-868.0K | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.3M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.4M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -85.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -62.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -40.5% | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.0% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -78.2% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -185.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.4% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.9% | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -55.8% | 111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -65.2% | 121.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.44 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.27 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.61 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.66 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.88 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.5M | $57.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $201.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.9M | $560.7M |
| Total Assets | $386.2M | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.5M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.5M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.8M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.8M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.5M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.2M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $201.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $94.9M | $560.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | $559.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.6M | $536.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.8M | $543.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $543.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.3M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $533.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.7M | $539.6M |
| Q4 25 | $386.2M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.9M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $310.8M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.9M | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $254.1M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.5M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.1M | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.3M | $59.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $59.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.0M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
