vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BlackSky Technology Inc. (BKSY) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $35.2M, roughly 1.6× BlackSky Technology Inc.). BlackSky Technology Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.5% vs -171.1%, a 168.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
BlackSky Technology Inc. is a leading geospatial intelligence provider operating a constellation of high-revisit small Earth observation satellites. It delivers real-time satellite imagery, advanced data analytics, and dynamic monitoring solutions to government, defense, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients globally to support data-driven operational decision-making.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
BKSY vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.2M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $-868.0K | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.5% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-868.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.4M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -85.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -62.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -40.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.0% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -78.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -185.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.9% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.7% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -65.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.44 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.27 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.61 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.66 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.88 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.5M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $201.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.9M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $386.2M | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.5M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.2M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $201.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $386.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $310.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $254.1M | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.3M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
