vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) and Sigma Lithium Corp (SGML). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.7M vs $15.3K, roughly 1163.4× Sigma Lithium Corp). Ballard Power Systems Inc. runs the higher net margin — 994.4% vs -120.1%, a 1114.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell products for markets such as heavy-duty motive, portable power, material handling as well as engineering services. Ballard has designed and shipped over 400 MW of fuel cell products to date.
Sigma Lithium Corp is a sustainable lithium mining firm operating assets primarily in Brazil. It produces high-purity battery-grade lithium concentrate, supplying global electric vehicle manufacturers and energy storage providers to support the global clean energy transition.
BLDP vs SGML — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.7M | $15.3K |
| Net Profit | $176.5M | $-25.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 994.4% | -120.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.3M | $15.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5K | ||
| Q1 22 | $3.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-25.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.8K | ||
| Q1 22 | $-22.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 156.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 994.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -120.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q1 22 | -659.1% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $47.9K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $79.9K |
| Total Assets | — | $269.2K |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.0K | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.8K | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $302.3K | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-4.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $-4.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-29.6K | ||
| Q1 22 | $-26.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
