vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS INC (BLFS) and FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP (FKWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $11.9M, roughly 1.6× FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP). BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS INC runs the higher net margin — 58.9% vs 4.5%, a 54.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs -33.1%). Over the past eight quarters, FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP's revenue compounded faster (39.0% CAGR vs 1.0%).

Biolife Solutions Inc. develops, manufactures and distributes specialized biopreservation products and cold chain management solutions for the cell and gene therapy, biopharmaceutical and regenerative medicine industries. It offers cryopreservation media, automated thawing systems, and temperature monitoring tools, serving biotech firms, research institutions and clinical labs globally.

Viaero Wireless is a regional wireless telecommunications company that provides direct coverage in Nebraska, eastern Colorado, western Kansas, and southeastern Wyoming. Based in Fort Morgan, Colorado, Viaero is often the primary cell tower owner in portions of its coverage area. Through roaming coverage partner relationships, Viaero customers can place and receive calls locally and across the country, internationally, and on cruise ships.

BLFS vs FKWL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BLFS
BLFS
1.6× larger
BLFS
$18.8M
$11.9M
FKWL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BLFS
BLFS
+57.4% gap
BLFS
24.3%
-33.1%
FKWL
Higher net margin
BLFS
BLFS
54.5% more per $
BLFS
58.9%
4.5%
FKWL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FKWL
FKWL
Annualised
FKWL
39.0%
1.0%
BLFS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Revenue
$18.8M
$11.9M
Net Profit
$11.1M
$533.6K
Gross Margin
17.1%
Operating Margin
7.2%
0.4%
Net Margin
58.9%
4.5%
Revenue YoY
24.3%
-33.1%
Net Profit YoY
-11.1%
133.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.23
$0.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$18.8M
$11.9M
Q3 25
$28.1M
$12.7M
Q2 25
$25.4M
$6.9M
Q1 25
$23.9M
$8.0M
Q4 24
$15.1M
$17.8M
Q3 24
$21.4M
$13.3M
Q2 24
$19.7M
$6.1M
Q1 24
$18.4M
$6.2M
Net Profit
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$11.1M
$533.6K
Q3 25
$621.0K
$640.5K
Q2 25
$-15.8M
$-342.2K
Q1 25
$-448.0K
$-644.8K
Q4 24
$12.5M
$228.7K
Q3 24
$-1.7M
$515.2K
Q2 24
$-20.7M
$-1.8M
Q1 24
$-10.2M
$-1.2M
Gross Margin
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
17.1%
Q3 25
22.8%
Q2 25
18.0%
Q1 25
16.9%
Q4 24
18.2%
Q3 24
15.5%
Q2 24
10.5%
Q1 24
8.4%
Operating Margin
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
7.2%
0.4%
Q3 25
-0.3%
4.6%
Q2 25
-65.5%
-19.0%
Q1 25
-5.1%
-24.6%
Q4 24
3.6%
4.5%
Q3 24
-2.0%
-2.8%
Q2 24
-6.6%
-36.7%
Q1 24
-17.9%
-25.2%
Net Margin
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
58.9%
4.5%
Q3 25
2.2%
5.0%
Q2 25
-62.3%
-4.9%
Q1 25
-1.9%
-8.1%
Q4 24
82.5%
1.3%
Q3 24
-8.0%
3.9%
Q2 24
-105.1%
-28.9%
Q1 24
-55.4%
-19.0%
EPS (diluted)
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$0.23
$0.05
Q3 25
$0.01
$0.05
Q2 25
$-0.33
$-0.03
Q1 25
$-0.01
$-0.05
Q4 24
$0.27
$0.02
Q3 24
$-0.04
$0.04
Q2 24
$-0.45
$-0.16
Q1 24
$-0.22
$-0.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$33.0M
$24.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$371.9M
$35.1M
Total Assets
$405.9M
$53.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$33.0M
$24.3M
Q3 25
$29.5M
$25.3M
Q2 25
$31.9M
$25.9M
Q1 25
$66.9M
$25.3M
Q4 24
$91.5M
$21.9M
Q3 24
$24.0M
$40.7M
Q2 24
$22.0M
$37.5M
Q1 24
$29.7M
$31.7M
Total Debt
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$5.0M
Q3 25
$7.5M
Q2 25
$10.1M
Q1 25
$12.9M
Q4 24
$15.9M
Q3 24
$20.1M
Q2 24
$21.1M
Q1 24
$24.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$371.9M
$35.1M
Q3 25
$353.7M
$35.1M
Q2 25
$347.2M
$34.5M
Q1 25
$352.6M
$35.3M
Q4 24
$348.9M
$36.0M
Q3 24
$325.5M
$35.8M
Q2 24
$321.4M
$35.1M
Q1 24
$333.4M
$36.9M
Total Assets
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$405.9M
$53.0M
Q3 25
$392.1M
$53.3M
Q2 25
$387.2M
$51.3M
Q1 25
$395.1M
$49.7M
Q4 24
$399.5M
$54.5M
Q3 24
$381.7M
$51.6M
Q2 24
$375.0M
$46.7M
Q1 24
$401.6M
$50.0M
Debt / Equity
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
0.01×
Q3 25
0.02×
Q2 25
0.03×
Q1 25
0.04×
Q4 24
0.05×
Q3 24
0.06×
Q2 24
0.07×
Q1 24
0.07×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$4.9M
$-4.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-4.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-34.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.44×
-7.66×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-9.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$4.9M
$-4.1M
Q3 25
$6.1M
$-1.5M
Q2 25
$7.4M
$2.3M
Q1 25
$1.7M
$-5.9M
Q4 24
$1.6M
$2.7M
Q3 24
$4.8M
$2.7M
Q2 24
$6.5M
$6.2M
Q1 24
$-4.5M
$-779.0K
Free Cash Flow
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
$-4.1M
Q3 25
$-1.5M
Q2 25
$2.3M
Q1 25
$-5.9M
Q4 24
$2.7M
Q3 24
$2.6M
Q2 24
$6.2M
Q1 24
$-816.0K
FCF Margin
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
-34.3%
Q3 25
-11.7%
Q2 25
33.6%
Q1 25
-73.7%
Q4 24
15.4%
Q3 24
19.9%
Q2 24
101.3%
Q1 24
-13.2%
Capex Intensity
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
0.1%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.1%
Q1 25
0.0%
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.2%
Q2 24
0.0%
Q1 24
0.6%
Cash Conversion
BLFS
BLFS
FKWL
FKWL
Q4 25
0.44×
-7.66×
Q3 25
9.83×
-2.32×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.13×
11.99×
Q3 24
5.18×
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons