vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BlackRock (BLK) and KKR & Co. (KKR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BlackRock is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.0B vs $5.7B, roughly 1.2× KKR & Co.). KKR & Co. runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs 20.0%, a 3.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, BlackRock's revenue compounded faster (24.5% CAGR vs -22.9%).
BlackRock, Inc. is an American multinational investment company. Founded in 1988, initially as an enterprise risk management and fixed income institutional asset manager, BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager, with $12.5 trillion in assets under management as of 2025. Headquartered in New York City, BlackRock has 70 offices in 30 countries and clients in 100 countries.
KKR & Co. Inc., also known as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., is an American global private equity and investment company. As of December 31, 2024, the firm had completed 770 private-equity investments with approximately $790 billion of total enterprise value. Its assets under management (AUM) and fee paying assets under management (FPAUM) were $553 billion and $446 billion, respectively.
BLK vs KKR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.0B | $5.7B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.7% | 45.3% |
| Net Margin | 16.1% | 20.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 76.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $9.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $900.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $510.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $-185.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $600.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $667.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $682.2M |
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 45.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.5% | 29.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.8% | 14.1% |
| Q4 25 | 16.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $7.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.90 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.99 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.5B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $12.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.9B | $30.9B |
| Total Assets | $170.0B | $410.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $55.9B | $30.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.5B | $29.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.1B | $28.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.0B | $27.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.2B | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3B | $21.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.9B | $21.4B |
| Q4 25 | $170.0B | $410.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.7B | $398.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.5B | $380.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.9B | $372.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $360.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.8B | $360.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $348.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $339.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3B | $-4.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.1B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 30.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.02× | -4.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $-4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $438.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-111.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-408.0M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-472.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.02× | -4.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | 2.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.75× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.26× | 2.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BLK
| Investment Advice | $5.3B | 75% |
| Investment Performance | $754.0M | 11% |
| Technology Services And Subscription Revenue | $531.0M | 8% |
| Distribution And Shareholder Service | $359.0M | 5% |
| Service Other | $86.0M | 1% |
KKR
| Insurance Segment | $3.5B | 61% |
| Asset Management1 | $703.7M | 12% |
| Transaction Fee | $512.0M | 9% |
| Transaction And Monitoring Fees | $268.7M | 5% |
| Fee Credit | $230.1M | 4% |
| Other | $201.5M | 4% |
| Fixed Annuity | $77.0M | 1% |
| Asset Management Segment | $56.9M | 1% |
| Monitoring Fee | $53.5M | 1% |
| Investment Advice | $40.6M | 1% |
| Fee Related Performance | $33.6M | 1% |
| Interest Sensitive Life | $21.7M | 0% |
| Incentive Fee | $11.0M | 0% |
