vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and ESAB Corp (ESAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($975.2M vs $727.8M, roughly 1.3× ESAB Corp). ESAB Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -1.4%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESAB Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs 0.3%). ESAB Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.3M vs $63.7M). Over the past eight quarters, ESAB Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs -4.5%).
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is a restaurant holding company that owns several American casual dining restaurant chains. The company was established in 1988 in Tampa, Florida, where it is headquartered.
ESAB, Elektriska Svetsnings-Aktiebolaget, is an American-Swedish industrial company.
BLMN vs ESAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $975.2M | $727.8M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $54.8M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | 14.6% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 83.0% | 2.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $975.2M | $727.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $928.8M | $715.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $678.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.0M | $670.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $910.0M | $673.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.4M | $707.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $689.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-45.9M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.4M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-79.5M | $53.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $82.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-83.9M | $60.0M |
| Q4 25 | 70.2% | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.4% | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.2% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.6% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.3% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.5% | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.5% | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 16.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.8% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | $0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.30 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.93 | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $1.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $1.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.96 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $59.5M | $218.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $787.4M | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $333.6M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.36× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.5M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $258.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | $291.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $249.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $253.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.9M | $228.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.7M | $76.5M |
| Q4 25 | $787.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $962.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $917.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $917.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $951.8M | $992.8M |
| Q4 25 | $333.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $397.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $380.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $286.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $302.7M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | 2.36× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.80× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.31× | 0.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.58× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.51× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.49× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.14× | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $119.1M | $81.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.7M | $70.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | 9.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.7% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $96.8M | $238.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $119.1M | $81.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.8M | $126.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.8M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.8M | $44.5M |
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $102.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.3M | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.1M | $74.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $37.1M |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.13× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.49× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.74× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BLMN
| Food And Beverage | $958.0M | 98% |
| Franchiseand Other Revenue | $17.2M | 2% |
| International Franchise Segment | $7.8M | 1% |
ESAB
| Consumable Products | $477.9M | 66% |
| Equipment Products | $249.9M | 34% |
