vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($975.2M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.7× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -1.4%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -4.5%).

Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is a restaurant holding company that owns several American casual dining restaurant chains. The company was established in 1988 in Tampa, Florida, where it is headquartered.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

BLMN vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BLMN
BLMN
1.7× larger
BLMN
$975.2M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+3.7% gap
KIM
4.0%
0.3%
BLMN
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
31.2% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-1.4%
BLMN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-4.5%
BLMN

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$975.2M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$-13.5M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
70.2%
Operating Margin
-1.4%
37.2%
Net Margin
-1.4%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
0.3%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
83.0%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.16
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$975.2M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$928.8M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$525.2M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$536.6M
Q4 24
$972.0M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$910.0M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$999.4M
$500.2M
Net Profit
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$-13.5M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$-45.9M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$25.4M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$42.2M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$-79.5M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$6.9M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$28.4M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
70.2%
Q3 25
70.4%
Q2 25
70.2%
Q1 25
70.1%
Q4 24
71.6%
Q3 24
71.3%
Q2 24
70.5%
Operating Margin
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
-1.4%
36.4%
Q3 25
-3.9%
34.9%
Q2 25
3.0%
39.2%
Q1 25
5.5%
33.6%
Q4 24
1.7%
31.7%
Q3 24
0.9%
33.7%
Q2 24
4.4%
32.1%
Net Margin
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
-1.4%
27.9%
Q3 25
-4.9%
25.7%
Q2 25
2.5%
31.0%
Q1 25
4.0%
24.8%
Q4 24
-8.2%
31.6%
Q3 24
0.8%
26.8%
Q2 24
2.8%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-0.16
Q3 25
$-0.54
Q2 25
$0.30
Q1 25
$0.50
Q4 24
$-0.93
Q3 24
$0.08
Q2 24
$0.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$59.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$787.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$333.6M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$3.2B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.36×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$59.5M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$66.5M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$50.3M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$57.7M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$70.1M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$83.6M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$117.9M
$126.4M
Total Debt
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$787.4M
$7.7B
Q3 25
$962.2M
Q2 25
$917.1M
Q1 25
$917.6M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$8.0B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.0B
Stockholders' Equity
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$333.6M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$344.1M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$397.2M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$380.6M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$135.5M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$242.1M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$286.8M
$10.6B
Total Assets
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$3.3B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.3B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.4B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.36×
0.74×
Q3 25
2.80×
Q2 25
2.31×
Q1 25
2.41×
Q4 24
7.58×
0.75×
Q3 24
4.51×
Q2 24
3.49×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$119.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$63.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$96.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$119.1M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$34.4M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$49.7M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$73.5M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$119.8M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$-7.8M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$42.4M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$63.7M
Q3 25
$-5.7M
Q2 25
$11.1M
Q1 25
$27.7M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$66.7M
Q3 24
$-67.3M
Q2 24
$-12.1M
FCF Margin
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.5%
Q3 25
-0.6%
Q2 25
1.1%
Q1 25
2.6%
38.3%
Q4 24
6.9%
Q3 24
-7.4%
Q2 24
-1.2%
Capex Intensity
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.7%
0.0%
Q3 25
4.3%
0.0%
Q2 25
3.8%
0.0%
Q1 25
4.4%
3.4%
Q4 24
5.5%
Q3 24
6.5%
Q2 24
5.5%
Cash Conversion
BLMN
BLMN
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.95×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.74×
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
-1.13×
2.18×
Q2 24
1.49×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BLMN
BLMN

Food And Beverage$958.0M98%
Franchiseand Other Revenue$17.2M2%
International Franchise Segment$7.8M1%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons