vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $508.3M, roughly 2.1× TIC Solutions, Inc.). Bloomin' Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs -9.3%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is a restaurant holding company that owns several American casual dining restaurant chains. The company was established in 1988 in Tampa, Florida, where it is headquartered.
BLMN vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $57.2M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.4% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $975.2M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $928.8M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $910.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $57.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-45.9M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.4M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-79.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 70.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.4% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.2% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $71.3M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $398.8M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $59.5M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.7M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $787.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $962.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $917.1M | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $917.6M | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $398.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $333.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $397.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $380.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $286.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.36× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.80× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.31× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.41× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $119.1M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.7M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.49× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BLMN
| Restaurant sales | $1.0B | 97% |
| Franchise and other revenues | $10.3M | 1% |
| Franchise revenues (1) | $7.6M | 1% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
