vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND) and Match Group (MTCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Match Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($878.0M vs $32.4M, roughly 27.1× Blend Labs, Inc.). Match Group runs the higher net margin — 23.9% vs -7.8%, a 31.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blend Labs, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 2.1%). Match Group produced more free cash flow last quarter ($308.1M vs $-21.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Blend Labs, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 1.1%).
GU Energy Labs is a company based in Berkeley, California, that produces sports nutrition products, most notably energy gels. Often consumed during endurance events, the gels are designed to be quickly and easily digested during any type of activity. Other products include energy chews, drink mixes, hydration tablets, stroopwafels and a Roctane line that includes an energy drink mix, protein recovery drink mix, gel, and capsules. The company was founded in 1994 by Bill Vaughan, who began crea...
Match Group, Inc. is an American internet and technology company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It owns and operates the largest global portfolio of popular online dating services including Tinder, Match.com, Meetic, OkCupid, Hinge, Plenty of Fish, Azar, and other dating global brands. The company was owned by IAC until July 2020 when Match Group was spun off as a separate, public company. As of 2019, the company had 9.3 million subscribers, of which 4.6 million were in North America. Japan ...
BLND vs MTCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.4M | $878.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $209.7M |
| Gross Margin | 75.7% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.1% | 32.4% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 23.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -207.0% | 32.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.4M | $878.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.7M | $914.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.8M | $831.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $860.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $895.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.7M | $864.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.8M | $859.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | $209.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1M | $160.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.8M | $125.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | $117.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-825.0K | $158.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $136.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.4M | $133.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-20.7M | $123.2M |
| Q4 25 | 75.7% | 74.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.3% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.8% | 72.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.8% | 71.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.2% | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.9% | 71.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.3% | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | -11.1% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.4% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.9% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -34.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -89.0% | 21.5% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -86.7% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $68.3M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | $3.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-30.5M | $-253.5M |
| Total Assets | $170.0M | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.3M | $340.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.8M | $414.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.2M | $970.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.3M | $860.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.9M | $843.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.1M | $920.9M |
| Q4 25 | $0 | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.9M | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $-30.5M | $-253.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.4M | $-223.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.1M | $-230.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.2M | $-182.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.4M | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-49.6M | $-88.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-45.5M | $-130.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.8M | $-107.8M |
| Q4 25 | $170.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.6M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.2M | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.5M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.1M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.1M | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.4M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $4.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $322.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.0K | $308.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 35.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-81.0K | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $322.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.6M | $320.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $243.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $193.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $254.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $264.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.7M | $129.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $284.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.0K | $308.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $306.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.1M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $177.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.1M | $247.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $251.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.5M | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.8M | $266.9M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.6% | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.1% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.5% | 31.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.30× | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BLND
| Mortgage Suite | $18.9M | 58% |
| Consumer Banking Suite | $11.4M | 35% |
| Professional Services | $2.1M | 6% |
MTCH
| Tinder Segment | $479.3M | 55% |
| Hinge Segment | $186.5M | 21% |
| Evergreen And Emerging Segment | $148.1M | 17% |
| MG Asia Segment | $65.8M | 7% |
