vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) and Honeywell (HON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bristol Myers Squibb is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5B vs $9.1B, roughly 1.4× Honeywell). Honeywell runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs 8.7%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Honeywell posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs 1.3%). Bristol Myers Squibb produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.6B vs $56.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Bristol Myers Squibb's revenue compounded faster (2.6% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, doing business as Bristol Myers Squibb, is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey. The company's primary products are apixaban (Eliquis) for people with atrial fibrillation ; nivolumab (Opdivo), used to treat certain types of cancer ; lenalidomide (Revlimid), used to treat multiple myeloma, smoldering myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndromes ; abatacept (Orencia), used to treat autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid art...
Honeywell International Inc. is an American publicly traded, multinational conglomerate corporation headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. It primarily operates in four areas of business: aerospace, building automation, industrial automation, and energy and sustainability solutions (ESS). Honeywell also owns and operates Sandia National Laboratories under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. Honeywell is a Fortune 500 company, ranked 115th in 2023.
BMY vs HON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.5B | $9.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $795.0M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 16.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1409.7% | -45.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $1.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $10.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-115.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.2% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.9% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 72.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 72.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.0% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.1% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.2% | 35.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 23.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.08 | $2.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $2.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.60 | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.83 | $2.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.2B | $12.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.8B | $32.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $74.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7B | $13.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $10.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $10.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $9.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.8B | $27.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7B | $30.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.9B | $30.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5B | $25.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.4B | $25.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | $25.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0B | $20.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.5B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6B | $16.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4B | $17.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3B | $18.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $74.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.0B | $73.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.9B | $80.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.7B | $78.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.4B | $75.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.6B | $75.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.7B | $73.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.6B | $69.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.63× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.81× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.85× | 1.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.03× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.89× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 1.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0B | $0 |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.6B | $56.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.8% | 0.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.82× | 0.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.8B | $5.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $597.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $346.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.99× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.65× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.62× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.38× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BMY
| Net Product Sales | $12.1B | 97% |
| Zeposia | $159.0M | 1% |
| Opdivo Ovantig | $132.0M | 1% |
| Abecma | $100.0M | 1% |
| Sotyktu | $86.0M | 1% |
HON
| Aerospace Technologies | $4.3B | 47% |
| Building Automation | $1.9B | 21% |
| Process Automation and Technology | $1.5B | 17% |
| Industrial Automation | $1.4B | 16% |
| Corporate and All Other | $5.0M | 0% |
