vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) and 3M (MMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bristol Myers Squibb is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.9× 3M). Bristol Myers Squibb runs the higher net margin — 23.3% vs 10.8%, a 12.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bristol Myers Squibb posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs 1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, 3M's revenue compounded faster (-1.8% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, doing business as Bristol Myers Squibb, is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey. The company's primary products are apixaban (Eliquis) for people with atrial fibrillation ; nivolumab (Opdivo), used to treat certain types of cancer ; lenalidomide (Revlimid), used to treat multiple myeloma, smoldering myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndromes ; abatacept (Orencia), used to treat autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid art...
The 3M Company is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, and consumer goods. Based in the Saint Paul suburb of Maplewood, the company produces over 60,000 products, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection film, electrical, electronic connecting, insulating materials, car-care products, electronic circuits, and optical films. Among its best-known consume...
BMY vs MMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $2.7B | $653.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | 23.3% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | 1.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.8% | -41.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $11.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | $6.3B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $653.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $577.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $834.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $723.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $728.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.2% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.9% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 72.5% | 42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 72.9% | 41.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.0% | 51.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.1% | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.2% | 42.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | 23.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 18.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.23 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.08 | $1.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $1.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.60 | $2.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.83 | $2.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.6B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $-42.2B | $10.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | — | $35.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.29× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $9.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $-42.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.8B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.9B | $13.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5B | $13.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.4B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0B | $13.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.0B | $37.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.9B | $37.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.7B | $38.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.4B | $40.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.6B | $39.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.7B | $40.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.6B | $43.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | 2.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.63× | 2.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.81× | 3.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.85× | 3.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.03× | 3.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.89× | 2.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 3.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BMY
Segment breakdown not available.
MMM
| Personal Safety | $912.0M | 15% |
| Commercial Branding and Transportation | $640.0M | 11% |
| Industrial Adhesives and Tapes | $604.0M | 10% |
| Electronics | $577.0M | 10% |
| Automotive and Aerospace | $484.0M | 8% |
| Electrical Markets | $356.0M | 6% |
| Abrasives | $349.0M | 6% |
| Home and Auto Care | $328.0M | 5% |
| Home Improvement | $311.0M | 5% |
| Automotive Aftermarket | $304.0M | 5% |
| Industrial Specialties Division | $286.0M | 5% |
| Consumer Safety and Well-Being | $278.0M | 5% |
| Packaging and Expression | $214.0M | 4% |
| Advanced Materials | $147.0M | 2% |
| Corporate | $121.0M | 2% |
| Roofing Granules | $119.0M | 2% |
