vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. (BNT) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimberly-Clark is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.2B vs $3.0B, roughly 1.4× Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd.). Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 16.2%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs 2.7%).
Brookfield Corporation is a Canadian multinational company that is one of the world's largest alternative investment management companies. It has over US$1 trillion of assets under management, much of which is workers’ deferred income from global public pension funds. It focuses on direct control investments in real estate, renewable power, infrastructure, credit and private equity. The company invests in distressed securities through Oaktree Capital, which it bought in 2019. Brookfield Corp...
Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational consumer goods and personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.
BNT vs KMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $4.2B |
| Net Profit | $516.0M | $675.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.0% | 18.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 16.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 91.8% | 17.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $675.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $499.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $446.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $516.0M | $509.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $567.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $447.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $907.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.0M | $544.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 13.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.5B | $542.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.8B | $1.9M |
| Total Assets | $148.9B | $17.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $542.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $688.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $617.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | $634.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $563.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.2B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $840.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.9B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $130.5B | $17.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.89× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BNT
Segment breakdown not available.
KMB
| NA | $2.7B | 64% |
| IPC | $1.5B | 36% |
