vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. (BNT) and Mohawk Industries (MHK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.1× Mohawk Industries). Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 1.6%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs 2.4%).
Brookfield Corporation is a Canadian multinational company that is one of the world's largest alternative investment management companies. It has over US$1 trillion of assets under management, much of which is workers’ deferred income from global public pension funds. It focuses on direct control investments in real estate, renewable power, infrastructure, credit and private equity. The company invests in distressed securities through Oaktree Capital, which it bought in 2019. Brookfield Corp...
Mohawk Industries is an American flooring manufacturer based in Calhoun, Georgia. Mohawk produces floor covering products for residential and commercial applications in North America and residential applications in Europe. The company manufacturing portfolio consists of soft flooring products, hard flooring products, laminate flooring, sheet vinyl and luxury vinyl tile, natural stone and quartz countertops. In Europe, the company also produces and sells insulation, panels and mezzanine flooring.
BNT vs MHK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $516.0M | $42.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.0% | 2.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 91.8% | -55.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $516.0M | $146.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $72.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.0M | $157.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $105.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.5B | $856.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.8B | $8.4B |
| Total Assets | $148.9B | $13.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $516.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | $546.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $702.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $666.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $424.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.2B | $497.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $658.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.9B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $130.5B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $459.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $265.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 10.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $616.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $459.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $386.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $319.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $233.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $183.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $310.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $126.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $204.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $96.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BNT
Segment breakdown not available.
MHK
| Other | $1.1B | 41% |
| Flooring NA Segment | $869.8M | 32% |
| Other Products | $270.0M | 10% |
| Other Geographical Areas | $222.0M | 8% |
| Laminateand Wood | $204.2M | 8% |
| Carpet And Resilient | $13.3M | 0% |
| Flooring ROW Segment | $4.9M | 0% |
