vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BioNTech SE (BNTX) and HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS, INC. (HALO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BioNTech SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $451.8M, roughly 3.4× HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS, INC.). BioNTech SE runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -31.3%, a 29.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
BioNTech SE is a German multinational biotechnology company headquartered in Mainz that develops immunotherapies and vaccines, particularly for cancer and infectious diseases.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is an American biotechnology company. It develops oncology therapies designed to target the tumor microenvironment.
BNTX vs HALO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $451.8M |
| Net Profit | $-28.7M | $-141.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 82.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | -20.6% |
| Net Margin | -1.9% | -31.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 51.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -203.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $451.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $354.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.8M | $325.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.8M | $264.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $298.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $290.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.7M | $231.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.6M | $195.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-141.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.7M | $175.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-386.6M | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-415.8M | $118.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.1M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $93.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 82.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 84.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 85.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.1% | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -192.1% | 62.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -292.2% | 53.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -750.7% | 50.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -270.4% | 48.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 49.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -148.2% | 50.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -227.5% | 44.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $133.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $48.8M |
| Total Assets | — | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 43.89× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $133.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $419.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $176.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $115.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $154.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $187.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $164.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $503.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $332.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $482.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $363.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $452.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $289.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $177.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $219.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $217.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 48.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $644.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $178.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $154.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $178.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $129.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $217.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $153.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $175.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $113.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $125.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 64.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BNTX
Segment breakdown not available.
HALO
| Royalty | $258.0M | 57% |
| Products | $122.7M | 27% |
| Proprietary Products Sales | $59.6M | 13% |
| Device Partnered Products | $12.9M | 3% |
